[Info-vax] That's just the way it is (Was Re: IPSec - Dear God in heaven NO!)

[Richard Maher]

"David J Dachtera" <djesys.no at spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:49D42A17.CEC3A129 at spam.comcast.net...
> Richard Maher wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> > "David J Dachtera" <djesys.no at spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:49D2E60B.18E9580D at spam.comcast.net...
> > > Richard Maher wrote:
> > > > [snip]
> > > > And in case it might have escaped
> > > > anyone's attention, let me point out that when it comes to what
people
> > think
> > > > (outside of technical VMS and IT discussion) I don't give a monkeys!
> > >
> > > Given that you have such a penchant for burning bridges and showing
such
> > > utter disrespect for your colleagues, that comes as no surprise.
> >
> > Trouble is I usually burn them *before* I cross them.
>
> Hhhmmm... Self-isolation. Intentional, at that.
>
> > So I'm a maker of
> > enemies, it's a talent.
>
> "Talent" isn't the word I would use. The one I would use would fall
> somewhere between behavioral aberration and psychosis.
>
> > But all I say to you and anyone else who's easily
> > offended,
>
> "easily offended"???!!! Even Charles Manson would find you offensive!
>
> > is leave the personalities and slight exaggeration
>
> Um, Richard? Your unique brand of hyperbole is the diametric opposite of
> "slight" exaggeration.
>
> > out and see the
> > facts/truth in what I've had to say.
>
> The "facts/truth" are hidden by the venom and vitriol.
>
> > Who were my colleagues again?
>
> Apparently, no one on c.o.v., possibly even anywhere in the real world.
>
> Seriously, Richard, turn the computers off, check yourself into the
> nearest facility and GET SOME HELP! ... BEFORE you have "the big one".
>
> I'm inclined to believe that even the (in)famous Carl Lydick would
> agree.
>
> D.J.D.

So that's what I get for trying to be nice; I knew I should've left it at
"bite me!" :-(

David, I'm not sure what it is that you find fascinating about me or what
attracts you to me, (and probably to others on the internet you're also
stalking) but I really don't have the time for it. This is at least the
fourth time you've responded to a post of mine with nothing but personal
attacks, abuse, and certainly nothing of substance regarding the
thread-topic (in this case IPsec and the HP/VMS erasure of same) Now, maybe
it was your intention all along to stifle any debate/analysis of what's
happening with IPsec and VMS Management in general, in which case "well
played",  but if for some reason you feel compelled to don a badge and
appoint yourself Newsgroup Sheriff of COV, or Keeper of the Collective
Conscience then you can simply fuck-off.

You're a grown man David (presumably). You are free to hit block-sender at
any time or simply ignore what I have to say. Or more than likely you (and
you're cronies who I am clearly making uncomfortable) will continue in your
attempts to pour scorn and heap ridicule on me and what I have to say.
Censoring what other people get to read, and form their opinions on, is
really what you're all about Comrade Nanna isn't it? Either way I can't be
arsed responding any further to someone akin to JF's Nomen Nescio stalker.
Knock yourself out. . .

Regards Richard Maher

PS. Now if I could just find a way to get clean; I scrub and scrub yet still
feel sullied. Eh gads, you don't have pictures of me do you? Hold on, I've
got just the pair of fragrant trophy-jocks that could interest a bloke like
you, maybe it would be therapeutic for both of us if I forwarded them on?