[Info-vax] OT: IBM Offering $9-10 Per Share for Sun

Christopher nadiasvertex at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 09:18:24 EDT 2009


On Apr 6, 12:01 am, "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilber... at comcast.net>
wrote:
> JF Mezei wrote:
> > Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
> >> I can not see why the VMS engineers would do that.
>
> > Because they love their work ?
>
> > Why did some engineers design the DS10L out of a midnight hack ? Once it
> > was done, Compaq liked it and sold tousands of them in high profile uses
> > (genome project).
>
> > Also, consider the highly theoretical/speculative scenario when VMS
> > engineers learned that VMS was to be canned with IA64 and that the date
> > was coming soon. Consider that high end folks at HP were heard saying a
> > VMS port to 8086 was not possible or too expensive (excuse).
>
> Did you ever consider that, just maybe, it's NOT feasible to port VMS to
> an 80x86 architecture?  Recall that VMS and the VAX architecture were
> designed together and that decisions were made regarding what would be
> done in software and what would be done in hardware!

That is just silly.  VMS will run on ANY Turing-complete
architecture.  It may run better on certain archs than others, but
there is nothing so special about VMS that it can't be made to run on
x64 platforms.



More information about the Info-vax mailing list