[Info-vax] Anyone interested in another public access system
yyyc186
yyyc186 at hughes.net
Mon Apr 6 15:46:51 EDT 2009
On Apr 4, 5:35 pm, billg... at cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon) wrote:
> In article <49D6D457.A96B7... at spam.comcast.net>,
> David J Dachtera <djesys... at spam.comcast.net> writes:
>
> How many times do you need to be told that Unix is adaptable enough that
> pretty much any of the things you mentioned could have been (and still
> could be) added except that Unix users don't see them as something to
> be bothered about.
>
Saying it doesn't make it true. UNIX, Linux, and Windows cannot
cluster. Period. There are many out there in the marketing world
commiting both wire and mail fraud each and every day with their
marketing shpeal, but it is is criminal fraud none-the-less.
The closest the Unix world _ever_ got to clustering was the clustering
provided by True64 and even that still wasn't clustering. It created
an animal which was shunned by both worlds, yet that animal was still
better than that half completed Unix variant put out by HP.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list