[Info-vax] Anyone interested in another public access system

Michael Kraemer M.Kraemer at gsi.de
Mon Apr 6 19:59:07 EDT 2009


yyyc186 schrieb:


> The "ratio" has more to do with Unix being free. 

commercial Unices aren't free.

> MBA's have a degree proving they have been
> purged of ethics, morals, and the concept of any sentient being
> deserving some level of dignity and respect.  This "free thinking"
> allows them to commit attrocities normally associate with people like
> Hitler and Mengela with a clear consience. 

His name is "Mengele".
And the stuff *you* are smoking clearly is hazardous to your
mental health.

> One has to understand
> these things to understand how Unix proliferated.  One has to also
> understand that corporations can murder tens of thousands without CEOs
> or the board of directors going to prison (think DOW Chemical and
> Bopal, Caremark and two rounds of killing off hemophiliacs (first from
> known HIV tainted source blood, second from China production facility
> having a sideline of industrial waste disposal))

And what exactly has this to do with clustering, records, Unix, VMS ?

> As a business back end, Unix/Linx are a crime against humanity.
> Without the concept of a record integrated in the OS kernel, you
> cannot create an integrated lock manager.  Without an integrated
> distributed lock manager you cannot create an integrated distributed
> transaction manager.  Without an integrated distributed transaction
> manager, you cannot cluster.  Period. 

May I bring to your attention that probably 99+x % of business'
have no use for that ?

> 
> Cheaper isn't better, it's simply cheaper.

Often enough, cheaper *is* better.




More information about the Info-vax mailing list