[Info-vax] nice for VMS

[Bob Koehler]

In article <49e7cd7e$0$90272$14726298 at news.sunsite.dk>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?= <arne at vajhoej.dk> writes:
> 
> If we speak about C then I believe that type of pointer fun is
> either undefined or implementation specific behavior, so there
> would most certainly not be any point in complaining.

   I don't have a copy of the standard handy, but I beleive in C that
   behaviour is defined.  I would not be surprised to see a vendor
   break it and would seriously avoid code depending on it.