[Info-vax] Should Oracle buy OpenVMS?
Bill Gunshannon
billg999 at cs.uofs.edu
Thu Apr 23 20:10:04 EDT 2009
In article <49efc743$0$90271$14726298 at news.sunsite.dk>,
Arne Vajhøj <arne at vajhoej.dk> writes:
> Bill Gunshannon wrote:
>> In article <49ee7768$0$90272$14726298 at news.sunsite.dk>,
>> Arne Vajhøj <arne at vajhoej.dk> writes:
>>> Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing wrote:
>>>> I'd heard it was pushing up into the high-end web space, although presumably
>>>> more for things like high-speed display of data (news aggregation, etc) than
>>>> for transaction-dependent things directly involving money.
>>> MySQL show up a lot pf places. It is actually an OK database.
>>
>> Database experts would likely disagree. Thankfully, we dropped it here
>> in favor of Postgres. Specifically because it lacked certain features
>> of real databases that needed to be taught and couldn't with MySQL.
>
> What features?
I am not a database expert so I could be wrong but one thing that I
seem to remember was someting called "constraints" and some kind of
"integrity". There were a number of things that real databases had
that MySQL not only didn't have but had no intention of adding.
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
billg999 at cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list