[Info-vax] Process memory settings

[Howard S Shubs]

In article <_KqdnZnGt6U9QhnXnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d at earthlink.com>,
 "John Reagan" <johnrreagan at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Well, it won't be stable after we take a roto-tiller to the code.   We'd 
> have to expand fields in the compiler when we build it (and hope we get the 
> sign-extensions correct).  You can't be suggesting we now make all our 
> fields in internal data structures be run-time sized with run-time 
> offsets?!?  Yeah, that'll be stable... not...

When are y'all planning to make the 64-bit change, then?  Never?  I 
tried to use 64-bit memory a week ago in C, and it was all good, until I 
needed the Fortran I/O library, at which point Strange Things happened.  
They stopped happening when I went back to 32-bit pointers.

-- 
Don't bother with piddly crap like "gun control".
Life is 100% fatal.  Ban it.