[Info-vax] calloc fails with access violation

Jan-Erik Söderholm jan-erik.soderholm at telia.com
Wed Aug 26 18:04:36 EDT 2009


Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing wrote:
> In article <edb3eb11-1119-45e8-9ae9-5247f2b3fc24 at w41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Jose Cuevas <jcuevas at mac.com> writes:
>> The code is running fine with descriptors.
>>
>> Thanks to every body and in particular to Jim Duff, sapienzaf, Bob
>> Gezelter, Richard Maher, Stephen Hoffman for their valuable samples.
>>
>> To Stephen Hoffman, will look into using your port of libwww.
>>
>> Not to prolong the topic any longer, or offend some people on the list
>> with our ignorance but if any body cares to explain/expeculate on the
>> issue of descriptors and calloc crashing please do so even if it is
>> off the list. I would appreciate the lesson...
>>
>> Finally we are using Apache on OpenVMS as a bridge to run Cobol
>> applications from our student system from a PHP front end, yet with
>> over 12,000 doing registration among other things, Apache does take a
>> big bite of the system resources, any ideas or experiences on
>> implementing SOAP, RPC, REST or anything of that sort with OpenVMS
>> will be appreciated. (and we are a state university, so money is a big
>> constrain for us...)
> 
> Haven't looked at this for awhile, but when I did: the WASD webserver
> ran faster and used fewer resources than Apache for similar workloads.
> (It's free, too.)
> 
> -- Alan
>

WASD runs faster in generall and runs SOAP calls (using gSOAP)
using FastCGI faster then Apache according to the gSOAP for
OpenVMS maintainer. And gSOAP (just as WASD) "free". The next
gSOAP kit (not sure it has been released yet, but should be in
a few weeks) comes with FastCGI examples for WASD also (apart
from Apahce).




More information about the Info-vax mailing list