On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:27:20 UTC, vaxinf at chemie.uni-konstanz.de wrote:
> OK!
>
> This works and is a better style than i !=0:
>
> for (i = n; i >= 0; i--) {
Oh, I agree; I was just trying to stay close to the original.
But defensive programming is always better, assuming i isn't unsigned!
--
Bob Eager