[Info-vax] Problems detected with analyze/disk

[Paul Sture]

In article <hecsjn$rc9$1 at pcls4.std.com>,
 moroney at world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

> "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> writes:
> 
> >I'd be inclined to suspect that some application or DCL script is 
> >playing fast and loose with the rules.  This sort of thing is quite rare 
> >on most systems.  If I WANTED to multiply allocate blocks I'd really 
> >have to work at it.
> 
> The quickest way to scrozzle a disk like that is a SCSI cluster
> configuration with two hosts and the drive on a SCSI bus, with both hosts
> mounting the disk without belonging to the same (or any) cluster, such as
> VAXCLUSTER=0 or mis-set EXPECTED_VOTES and no cluster communication
> between them.

The first release of XFC did it in a cluster too :-(

IIRC it took several attempts to fix.

-- 
Paul Sture