[Info-vax] VMS v8.4 disk corruption

[Arne Vajhøj]

On 11-08-2010 17:48, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
> In article<4c630a5a$0$280$14726298 at news.sunsite.dk>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?=<arne at vajhoej.dk>  writes:
>> On 11-08-2010 12:32, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>>> In article<i3uhle$3ml$1 at pcls6.std.com>, moroney at world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) writes:
>>>> koehler at eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) writes:
>>>>
>>>>> In article<4c61bfa2$0$6090$c3e8da3 at news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei<jfmezei.spamnot at vaxination.ca>   writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally, I find the ability to see what passwords are being used
>>>>>> during an attack to be extremely important. Telling whether they are
>>>>>> using radom/common passwords from a dictionary or whether they are using
>>>>>> brute force, or whether they seem to have a valid password are all very
>>>>>> important distinctions.
>>>>
>>>>>     How do you know what the valid password is for someone else's
>>>>>     account?  Or are you the only user on these systems?
>>>>
>>>> I've seen things where breakin messages were going to the operator's
>>>> console with things like this:
>>>>
>>>> Breakin attempt for user FOOBAR
>>>> ....
>>>> Password: SEXYLADY1
>>>>
>>>> Breakin attempt for user FOOBAR
>>>> ....
>>>> Password: SEXYLADY2
>>>>
>>>> Breakin attempt for user FOOBAR
>>>> ....
>>>> Password: SEXYLADY3
>>>>
>>>> Breakin attempt for user FOOBAR
>>>> ....
>>>> Password:<valid>
>>>>
>>>> Breakin attempt for user FOOBAR
>>>> ....
>>>> Password: SEXYLADY5
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> The actual incorrect passwords are part of the OPCOM message, and a
>>>> valid password was replaced by the string "<valid>".
>>>> The login was denied due to breakin evasion already in force.
>>>> It can be obvious from the pattern what the real password is.
>>>> Regardless, it's definite that they did enter a valid password.
>>>>
>>>> This is how it worked a while ago, I don't know what it does now.
>>>
>>> Is this machine on the internet so that I can log in as FOOBAR:SEXYLADY4?
>>
>> I believe that it is username+password not node+username.
>
> Huh???  Where did/does the nodename come in?

I read it as being with :: not : ...

Arne