[Info-vax] VAXCluster vs. VMSCluster?

[AdeV]

Bob Eager may or may not have intoned:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:41:35 -0500, JF Mezei wrote:
> 
> > I don't recall which VMS licences come with the hobbyisyt programme. But
> > they would likely start with VMS or VAXVMS
> 
> VAX-VMS - but it is delivered separately from the layered products (and 
> has to be requested separately) so it's obvious which one it is.
> 
> I wonder if the OP omitted to request the actual VMS license?

Bob - No, I didn't forget, I have the VAX-VMS licence too. That is fine 
on ASTVAX, but it won't share across to MV0001 (because of the NO_SHARE 
option...); but that's OK for now, I'd like to get the VMSCLUSTER sorted 
before I look at the VMS licence.

> 
> > LICENSE REGISTER  adds the data to the on-disk database. LICENSE LIST   
> >   shows data from the on-disk database LICENSE LOAD      makes a licence
> > active on this node if it is valid.
> > 
> > SHOW LICENSE	 shows active licences on this node.
> 
> It may be easier, for a beginner, to use:
> 
>   @SYS$UPDATE:VMSLICENSE.COM
> 

Unfortunately, whilst that does save some typing, it ultimately doesn't 
help as loading/enabling/modifying the VMSCLUSTER license doesn't seem 
to make any difference. I also found I couldn't register licenses via 
that script, as it asked some questions which the licenses I received 
didn't answer; either that, or I typed a zero instead of an O in the 
checksum...

-- 
Cheers!
Ade.