[Info-vax] Routing when using two interfaces/networks.

[jbriggs444]

On Jan 20, 3:48 pm, GraphicDave <graphicd... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 10:36 am, jbriggs444 <jbriggs... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Note that the 193.183.0.0/16 either has the wrong netmask or Jan's
> > company is squatting on address space that they do not own.  According
> > to RIPE, Electrolux only has 193.183.64.0/18
>
> > netname:         SE-LUXNET
> > descr:           Electrolux Data AB
>
> It is not good practice and may not apply to Jan-Erik and his company
> but those addresses can be used on an internal company network without
> impact on Electrolux or others.
> Do to bad decisions when my company was built we used 150.2.0.0/16
> subnets internally behind our firewall even though it was owned by a
> Japanese/Asian company.
>
> David Reynolds

Yeah.  My company is squatting on some pieces of 193.32 and 193.154.

It works fine until it breaks -- e.g. when somebody complains that
they can't get to a web site located on the real address space.