[Info-vax] Poulson info from Dave Cantor

[Bill Gunshannon]

In article <0d642cb6-ee5b-43e3-b361-a873c3e7885d at i10g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
	Neil Rieck <n.rieck at sympatico.ca> writes:
> On Nov 17, 1:54 pm, "John Reagan" <johnrrea... at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT111710021604
>>
>> John
> FYI,
> Go back and read the comments posted to this article. They are quite
> informative; some people were posting anonymously 

I, for one, place absolutely no value on anonymous comments.  If you can't
stand by what you say, don't say it.

>                                                   (and sound like they
> might be Intel insiders); 

If they are prohibited from saying anything publicly, saying it anonymously
would still violate their terms of employment.

>                           one of the posters is no other than Linus
> Torvald

Is that somehow supposed to impress people?  He sure didn't impress
Aandrew Tanenbaum, who's opinion I place in a much higher value.

bill

-- 
Bill Gunshannon          |  de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n.  Three wolves
billg999 at cs.scranton.edu |  and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton   |
Scranton, Pennsylvania   |         #include <std.disclaimer.h>