[Info-vax] Another nail in the VMS coffin...

[VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG]

In article <4dcc7510$0$32200$c3e8da3$670ba073 at news.astraweb.com>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot at vaxination.ca> writes:
>Richard Maher wrote:
>
>> Me too. Thanks very much for whoever swung this!
>
>I suspect it was a significant customer who complained high up ebough
>for some VP to be abvle to override teh "must adhere to new standards"
>and authroise the return of the non-compliant VMS documentation.
>
>(and perhaps authorised funds to convert it, but who knows...)

Yeah!  Whilst I began this thread, I am certain that nobody in Hopelessly
Pathetic gives a shit about my opinion but, nonetheless, I am pleased with
the output.  And, this came just in the nick of time as I just moved 22 
boxes (10"x12"x24") of documentation into my garage to make room for some
European guests next week.  I welcome not having to rely on PDF versions
for a quick reference.
-- 
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker    VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG

All your spirit rack abuses, come to haunt you back by day.
All your Byzantine excuses, given time, given you away.