[Info-vax] OT: About Digital and divisions
ChrisQ
meru at devnull.com
Wed Nov 23 18:47:49 EST 2011
On 11/23/11 18:37, Paul Sture wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:25:23 +0000, ChrisQ wrote:
>>
>> Nearly all the companies I worked with used 3rd party drives and
>> controllers, as well as analog / digital and specialist comms cards. It
>> was a thriving ecosystem, because the dec kit was so much more expensive
>> and in many cases, no better quality or reliability. The most common
>> disk setup would be fujitsu smd drives with either Dilog or more
>> commonly, Emulex disk controllers, on unibus or qbus. Emulex were and
>> are a first class engineering company and still in business,
>> whereas many of the others faded into obscurity in later years...
>>
>
> Does anyone remember Emulex CS-32 terminal controllers? These took the
> interrupts associated with DZ-11s off the system, and IIRC you only
> needed one slot to support 32 lines.
>
I remember the Emulex comms cards. Never saw the 32 line version, but
vaguely
remember the CS-08 and CS-16, which were the 8 and 16 line versions. I
don't
think they were DL11 emulation, which did generate an interrupt per
char, but
more likely a CXA16 style emulation, which had on board fifo and pre
processing. May even have some of those cards in store, though sold off
/ gave
away much of the collected dec kit some years ago. The Emulex dual smd
controllers
were quite a work of art. The QD32/33 did mscp emulation in only a dual
height
qbus card and a couple of dozen chips, whereas the kda50 was two quad
height
boards with hundreds of chips and lots of amps from the psu. Worked in
microvax
and pdp and you could hang 2 x 8" fujitsu 2 Gbyte (2382 ?) drives on a
single
controller, which was quite a lot of storage at the time. Coming
originally from
a hardware background, I couldn't help but respect the skill in getting
so much
functionality in such a small footprint and their prowess with custom
microcircuits,
which did most of the work on the cards.
I
The setup was quite interesting, in that you had to load the drive
format and bad
block utilities from the controller firmware via a short hand entered
assembler
program, which then dma'd the utilities into main memory. Looking back
it seems
a bit tortuous, but pretty standard stuff at the time.
The problem with dec wasn't just the cost, but functionality gaps which
were quick to
be filled by the third party vendors. Viking dual height scsi
controllers were
another example, one of which emulated mscp and tmscp -> scsi on the
same dual height
qbus card. Part number was the qdt, iirc, with the disk only version
being the qd0.
Rocking horse material now and very expensive, even if you can find one.
This should probably be on afc, but hey :-)...
Regards,
Chris
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list