[Info-vax] HP stopping VMS paper documentation ?

[urbancamo]

> I disagree with this. I've been writing code for a long time and it was
> definitely easier and I still prefer having a manual open on the desk for
> reference. Switching back and forth from where you are editing code to a
> manual in PDF is extremely disruptive, and searching using Acrobat takes
> longer than finding the information in a manual (even a very large one) if
> you know the manual from years of using it. Paper manuals are a clear win
> on this alone. I like having a full set of printed doc around and I prefer
> real books as well.

Worse thing about PDFs is that you cant 'browse' the same way as paper manuals. I love PDFs (or indeed the internet in general) if you have a problem to solve. However, generally getting a feel for a system/programming language/you pick the subject happens much quicker if you can browse paper manuals. 

I am fortunate that I have a fairly complete set of VMS manuals. Occasionally I'll pick one at random and flick through. I can guarantee I learn something everytime.

I do print out manuals (on a laser printer - not sure why all the discussion is focused on inkjets. I've a Kyocera FS1020D, the cheapest to purchase/run duplex printer at the time. You just have to know about Platenclean after about 18 months). Sometimes they get read cover to cover. Sometimes I realize it was a mistake.

Just my tuppence, as always...

Mark.