[Info-vax] VMS84A_ACRTL-V0100 problem

[Rich Jordan]

On Apr 10, 3:07 pm, "Syltrem" <syltremz... at videotron.ca> wrote:
> "Rich Jordan" <jor... at ccs4vms.com> wrote in message
>
> news:61a5d917-0e28-4175-b7af-fcfa844081a8 at n5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 10, 10:32 am, "Syltrem" <syltremz... at videotron.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Rich Jordan" <jor... at ccs4vms.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:cb260d25-a6e6-4cb7-ab38-b357bba24833 at 2g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > If anyone has installed this kit can you please let us know if you had
> > > any issues with it?
>
> > > I haven't yet (and won't till this weekend) but I got an error trying
> > > to get its release notes:
>
> > > $ PRODUCT EXTRACT RELEASE_NOTES VMS84A_ACRTL
> > > ...
> > > %PCSI-I-CREFIL, created file SYS$SYSDEVICE:[CSCPAT]VMS84A_ACRTL-
> > > V0100.RELEASE_NOTES;1
> > > %PCSI-I-CREFIL, created file SYS$SYSDEVICE:
> > > [CSCPAT]SHARED_MEMORY_APIS_IN_OPENVMS_CRTL.TXT;1
> > > %PCSI-E-OPENOUT, error opening SYS$SYSDEVICE:[CSCPAT],; as output
> > > -RMS-F-MRS, invalid maximum record size
> > > %PCSIUI-E-ABORT, operation terminated due to an unrecoverable error
> > > condition.
>
> > > $
>
> > > The two listed files are created, both in normal VMS text format
> > > (Variable length sequential).
>
> > > A list and validation of the kit both pass
>
> > > I think this is the same kit (or an upgrade to same) that you have to
> > > install with Samba V1.2; that second text file is the same as one that
> > > comes with that kit. I'm trying to get confirmation of that.
>
> > > Thanks for any info or test results.
>
> > I don't know but why -V100 ?
> > I'm planning to install patches and the current one is -V800
> > This one must be quite old.
>
> > Syltrem
>
> > You're mistaken; VMS84A_ACRTL V1 was just recently released.  Are you
> > working with a different VMS version?
>
> Ooops.. Yes - I read 83 and that was 84.
> I don't have the patch right now so I cannot test to extract the release
> notes.
> Sorry for the confusion
>
> Syltrem

No worries.  The patch ended up installing fine and so far Samba is
still testing out ok.