[Info-vax] Databases versus RMS
Paul Sture
paul at sture.ch
Sat Apr 21 12:55:03 EDT 2012
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:56:55 +0200, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> John Wallace wrote 2012-04-21 12:09:
>> Restart in modern context is nothing to do with core (or even battery
>> backed) memory. RESTART actually means "see if there's a crash dump in
>> memory, and if there is, write the dump before rebooting".
>
> I was probably thinking about CONTINUE which is of course something
> else... :-)
>
Ah yes, on my first 11/780 I got the job of testing an in house print
spooler. This ran at a high priority (15?) by default which would have
been fine if it had been properly debugged first :-)
When it got into an argument with some other component, the least
disruptive way of killing it was to do alternate CTRL/P and C(ONTINUE)
commands on the console until you got a PC in user space. Then you could
deposit zero in that PC and CONTINUE
Crude but effective.
The outcome of that was that I proposed that we junk that component and
provide user friendly API wrappers for queuing print jobs. :-)
--
Paul Sture
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list