[Info-vax] Polarhome OpenSSL kit missing a header file?

[Mark Daniel]

On 29/04/12 3:02 AM, Steven Schweda wrote:
>> and the openssl-101b.zip (at least) appears to be missing an include file:
>>
>> #include<openssl/srtp.h>   /* Support for the use_srtp extension */
>> .^
>> %CC-F-NOINCLFILEF, Cannot find file<openssl/srtp.h>  specified in
>> #include directive.
>> at line number 1363 in file SSLROOT:[include]ssl.h;1
>
>     When you do _what_, exactly?  And what is "SSLROOT" when
> you're doing this?

There's sufficient information in the report for anyone not distracted 
with composing notes of condescension.  Give some of us some credit for 
having some experience.  The world-weary, oh here's another one to deal 
with, is a bit thin with overuse.

>     I haven't tried any OpenSSL 1.0.1 stuff since a
> pre-release snapshot from "20101217", so I know nothing, but
> if I were looking for working stuff, and if I had a C
> compiler, then I'd start at openssl.org.  When the
> polarhome.com fellow says "TESTED", he doesn't always mean
> what most people mean when they say "tested", and building it
> yourself means that you get to enable some options (like zlib
> support, for example) which might be missing from a pre-built
> kit.

For anyone interested I grabbed an SRTP.H off the net and dropped it 
into SSLROOT:[INCLUDE] (OPENSSL:) and the code compiles and runs fine. 
Should have thought to do this before bothering with c.o.v.

My thanks again to Polarhome for making these kits available, and it 
looks like the kit build procedure needs a tweak.