[Info-vax] HP wins Oracle Itanium case
Keith Parris
keithparris_deletethis at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 3 16:45:01 EDT 2012
On 8/2/2012 9:26 PM, JF Mezei wrote:
> From what I read, the Hurd issue simply confirmed that a previous
> contract was not ended. So the fine print and dots on the i would be in
> the original contract, not in the Hurd agreement.
Actually, the Hurd Agreement confirmed that established practices (of
porting and release of new versions) would continue. So those historical
practices were effectively put into writing by Oracle and HP signing
that Agreement.
The court found HP had kept up its end of the bargain after the
Agreement, despite Oracle doing sneaky tricks like doubling the core
factor for Itanium (thus raising the price of Oracle on Itanium compared
with Sun).
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list