[Info-vax] DCL, was: Re: Microkernel

John Wallace johnwallace4 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 12 13:02:24 EDT 2012


On Aug 12, 5:40 pm, Simon Clubley <clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-
Earth.UFP> wrote:
> On 2012-08-12, ChrisQ <m... at devnull.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Another way might be to save the (just reloaded) recall buffer as a
> > separate file on entry to a session, then you just have to compare
> > that at any time later with the current recall buffer to know what's
> > been added or changed. Something like this must have been done years
> > ago though. Perhaps something on old decus tapes ?.
>
> I've never seen anything like this available for DCL. The first time I
> heard of permanent command history recall was on Unix based systems.
>
> I've just had a look online to see if I could find anything and I could
> not, although I do see that Hoff has a comparison between DCL and bash
> on his website, and I also see I've been asking for this capability for
> a number of years. :-)
>
> > Usually have 2 or 3 terminal sessions running bash here, and they all have
> > unique history files. Not sure how that works though...
>
> Interesting. For me, everything ends up in ~/.bash_history.
>
> (I've just double checked to be sure. :-) This is on a RHEL 5.x clone.)
>
> Simon.
>
> --
> Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
> Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world

Had this discussion at work a while back re one global bash history vs
separate bash histories per shell instance. This was on a not quite up
to date Fedora, I forget which. Anyway it's a config option somewhere,
and it's documented (ie it's on the web somewhere). Can't remember
where though.

http://serverfault.com/questions/337123/strange-bash-history-behaviour-when-running-multiple-sessions
looks potentially relevant although I'm not sure it is either
necessary or sufficient.



More information about the Info-vax mailing list