[Info-vax] Trial Phase 2 (was Re: HP wins Oracle Itanium case)

[JF Mezei]

Keith Parris wrote:

> HP's legal team had the correct answer to this, IMO:

Would HP object to amending the 2010 contract to include specific
mention of which Oracle products on which HP operating system on Itanium
are covered ? At the end of the day, vague contracts are not very good.


And HP's statement is interesting because it would get Oracle off the
hook for new products.