[Info-vax] VMS License Generator

Richard B. Gilbert rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Sun Jan 29 16:33:22 EST 2012


On 1/29/2012 2:39 PM, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply wrote:
> In article<fg4FbdAV$Y2j at eisner.encompasserve.org>,
> cornelius at eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) writes:
>
>>> Right, it's a crime, plain and simple.
>>
>> In most countries, perhaps.  Even, on the surface, in the U.S.
>>
>> [BEGIN WELL OFF TOPIC REMARK]
>>
>> There is, however, a constitutional guarantee of freedom of
>> speech,
>
> Note: this post is not a direct reply to the quoted lines, but rather a
> general reply to various posts in this thread.
>
> Precisely because I value free speech extremely highly I am highly
> critical of people abusing it, for example claiming that it is some sort
> of human right to be able to download the latest Lady Gaga song without
> paying for it.
>
> In general, not everything involving communication (which to a large
> part is the internet) necessarily has anything to do with free speech.
>
>> and many of us believe that certain provisions of, say,
>> the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, run roughshod over that
>> guarantee and might not in truth survive a constitutional
>> challenge.
>
> If so, then a court should rule that it is unconstitutional.  I think
> that in such cases it is better to target the offending parts, rather
> than throwing the baby out with the bathwater.  It is the "correct"
> thing to do and has the added advantage that it is more likely to
> succeed.
>
>> It's one thing to say you cannot copy a protected
>> work; it's another to claim you cannot publish a means by which
>> copyright protection can be circumvented.
>
> True, they are different, but depending on laws and court decisions,
> both might be illegal.  It is one thing to kill a person and another to
> pay someone to do so, but that does not mean that both cannot be illegal
> just because they are different.
>
> Just to be clear: in this case, we are not talking about a copyright
> violation, but rather something else.
>

I fear that some people are utterly lacking the capacity to understand 
the concept of "intellectual property"!  This includes copyright on 
anything you write; e.g. a novel, a text-book, an original drawing or 
painting, music that you composed, your performance of a piece of music, 
a patented invention, etc.

The above paragraph is Copyright 2012 by Richard B. Gilbert
Permission is hereby granted to use the text provided that proper 
attribution is given!




More information about the Info-vax mailing list