[Info-vax] Current VMS engineering quality, was: Re: What's VMS up to these

[David Froble]

Michael Kraemer wrote:
> Johnny Billquist schrieb:
> 
>>
>> True, since in Unix-land, the occasional corruption of data is 
>> considered an acceptable tradeoff.
>>
> 
> On these occasions (and in general) there wasn't corruption of data
> on Unix.
> There was, however, a corruption of service on VMS,
> which was by far the larger damage.
> 

You should not use a hammer to drive a screw, and you should not use a screwdriver to 
hammer a nail.

 From reading your posts, I can only assume that you are blaming VMS for other problems, 
such as network failure, and poorly configured systems for whatever your requirements are.

If you're posting here to show that you've been able to poorly configure computer systems, 
life is too short, get one.