[Info-vax] HP to axe 30,000 jobs to cut costs
AEF
spamsink2001 at yahoo.com
Sun May 27 20:00:45 EDT 2012
On May 27, 1:07 pm, Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderh... at telia.com>
wrote:
> AEF wrote 2012-05-27 16:02:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 9:51 pm, Arne Vajhøj<a... at vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> >> On 5/18/2012 2:01 PM, John Wallace wrote:
>
> >>> On May 18, 2:55 pm, Jan-Erik Soderholm<jan-erik.soderh... at telia.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Paul Sture wrote 2012-05-18 15:44:
>
> >>>>>http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/09411f3c-
> >>>>> a054-11e1-88e6-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1vCHQVMBD
>
> >>>>> or tinyurl:
>
> >>>>>http://preview.tinyurl.com/7npqe4j
>
> >>>>> Ouch!
>
> >>>> "FT.com articles are only available to registered
> >>>> users and subscribers"
>
> >>>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/17/hp_whitman_job_cuts_rumor/
>
> >>> Go to Google, search for something in the article, click on the link
> >>> and read *that article* only, no registration necessary. Bug ?
> >>> Feature? Who cares, enjoy it while it lasts.
>
> >> It works like this:
> >> * the site want the Google hits so they allow Google in
> >> * if people complain to Google that the link found via
> >> Google does not allow access to users then Google will
> >> blacklist the site
> >> * so the site allows requests with Google as referrer
>
> >> Arne
>
> > What? You can complain to Google and they'll actually respond?
>
> > AEF
>
> I have read Arne's post several times...
> Where did he say that Google respond? I think that
> he wrote that they act (and that might be automated).
Well, depends how you define "respond". If you define it as
"to reply", you're right. If you define it as "to react", as in "his
back injury has failed to respond to treatment", then I'm right. If
Google "acts", you can consider that a "response", in which case they
"respond".
Getting back to you on an old topic:
About reading PDF files on the monitor: the print is too small. Make
it bigger, you say. Now you've split pages, which is especially
annoying with two-column pieces and figures. And figures are usually
blurry and even harder to read. (Maybe it's partly caused by my cheap
ViewSonic monitor at work.) And it almost never comes up the right
size in the first place so as to have one page per screen. Basically a
no-win situation, unless you print it.
OK.
AEF
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list