[Info-vax] Completely OT: Frank Lloyd Wright

[JF Mezei]

On 12-10-07 14:43, Dirk Munk wrote:

> Indeed. Restoring this house to its former glory, making sympathetic 
> improvements to modernize it, and you might have a house that is very 
> attractive to buyers with a sense for architecture and culture, and who 
> are willing to pay a bonus for that.

Say 75% of an arhitect's work was fantastic but the remainder was really
dismal.

Should you glorify that architect by preserving only the fantastic work
and hiding/destroying the bad work ?

If an architect's work has become world renowed, shouldn't one be
preserving all of his work ? For instance, you could show progression in
his styles , and also so that he was not perfect.