[Info-vax] turning verify on and off
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Sun Feb 3 09:15:53 EST 2013
On 2013-02-03 13:54:58 +0000, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply said:
> Neither. I'm just wondering if something could be done more elegantly.
If you wish a more elegant solution, then look to reduce and simplify,
and to eliminate code.
Complex solutions to simple problems are usually the antithesis of elegance.
>> If the latter, I rewrote
>> sys$manager:sylogin.template and a few other DCL procedures a while
>> back, and you can see the one-liner that I tend to use in that. Stick
>> that line inside a loop, and you're off and verifying.
>
> Yes. My procedure differs mainly in avoiding hard-coding the name of
> the logical and turning it on in some and off in others in a call tree.
Is the hard-coding of the debugging logical name a problem you actually
have to solve in the DCL code?
Or is that DCL trading off added complexity and reduced elegance for
some other benefit that's not obvious to me?
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list