[Info-vax] Oracle loses appeal in HP/Oracle Lawsuit
glen herrmannsfeldt
gah at ugcs.caltech.edu
Wed Feb 13 14:51:18 EST 2013
Bill Gunshannon <billg999 at cs.uofs.edu> wrote:
> In article <01cecda9-3679-4ec5-8d61-2891f8bb8234 at googlegroups.com>,
> Neil Rieck <n.rieck at sympatico.ca> writes:
>> I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but consider this: the only
>> way for Oracle/Ellison to save face on Oracle's mistake
>> (announcing the end of publishing software for Itanium)
>> was to loose an appeal in the courts.
> Personally, I think Oracle should charge what Itanium versions actually
> costs and not let the other versions subsidize maintenance and development.
> I suspect the result wold be 0 sales of Oracle products for Itanium which
> is basicly what Oracle said the real interest was.
Actual cost or marginal cost? I would hope that most of the development
is common between all versions.
>> Just my two-cents worth.
> And mine. And we all now 2 cents is worth today, American or Canadian.
-- glen
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list