[Info-vax] ODS-5 data/file recovery
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Sat Feb 16 21:04:21 EST 2013
On 2013-02-17 01:28:00 +0000, David Froble said:
> MG wrote:
>
>> Do you have terabytes to back up? Because that would be one of the
>> issues I'd have to overcome.
>
> No, and that makes it much easier. Most of my disks are rather old, 1
> GB, 2 GB and such, and not very full. I've also got some 36 GB disks
> on my Alpha, and I use these strictly for image save sets of the
> smaller disks.
>
> Frankly, while it's a bit more complex, backing up just what has
> changed works rather well. With terabytes of storage, I've got to
> believe that 99% of it does NOT change on a daily basis. So it still
> should be a managable thing.
Storage prices are headed back downward, again. Four-terabyte 6 Gbps
SATA disks are US$210 on Amazon.
With smaller SCSI storage configurations, I've rolled out new 146 GB
SCSI drives into some older configurations; those were US$40 each, when
reusing some "spare" parts.
When it comes to making data backups, it's a case of capturing the data
churn while avoiding copying out data that's easily recoverable from
distro, as David states. BACKUP does this incremental stuff fairly
well, though (as I've groused before) everybody gets to roll their own
DCL procedures.
So find your static data. Add some disks for target storage. Roll
your own DCL incremental BACKUPs.
I'm not so sure tapes make all that much sense for small shops and
hobbyists, either. Yeah, tapes do work. Decent choices for long-term
and off-site, too. Tape drives (with decent capacity), libraries
(again, with decent capacities), and tape media are (fairly) expensive,
and (without a library or loader) require some manual effort. For
transient and local backups and particularly hobbyist stuff, disks are
a cheap^Winexpensive choice.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list