[Info-vax] PATHWORKS 32 Licensing

[Paul Sture]

In article <26edncBE_px4AHTNnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d at mchsi.com>,
 "John E. Malmberg" <wb8tyw at qsl.network> wrote:

> The PATHWORKS licensing situation was complicated:

Yes it was.  With the version I used occasionally in the mid 90s, the 
Licensing Manual was just as thick as the System Management Guide.

ISTR that it had been taken off software support by that site because no 
patches came through for a long time, and there was no longer a business 
case for it.

-- 
Paul Sture