[Info-vax] Unix on A DEC Vax?
Bill Gunshannon
billg999 at cs.uofs.edu
Wed Jan 16 14:17:50 EST 2013
In article <0Z+EZS2eNX3C at eisner.encompasserve.org>,
koehler at eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) writes:
> In article <49cb86f1-8fc5-4e9c-bb01-921e99ce470d at googlegroups.com>, haziz <hsaziz at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> I have a few questions:
>>
>> Which Unix version to install on the Vax? Original UC Berkeley BSD Unix? Op=
>> enBSD? NetBSD? Ultrix if I can get a legal copy? AT&T Unix? For emotional r=
>> easons I may prefer to install some version of the original UC Berkeley BSD=
>> (1980s Bill Joy/Marshall Kirk McKusick Era), but will go with whichever is=
>> easier to install, the machine is newer (production started 1991) than the=
>> original BSD Unix versions. I would call it nostalgia except I never did u=
>> se the original BSD Unix. Another consideration would be some version of AT=
>> &T Unix if it will run.
>
> I'm not sure which versions of the various UNIX will run on that
> system, other than DEC's ULTRIX,
According to the web (and the web never lies) Ultrix does not run on
the 4000/90. I didn't think it did. I don't remember ever having
success getting it running on any of my 4000's.
> but I'd be suprised if on of the
> free UNIX didn't.
Sadly, if he find one that does (either netBSD or OpenBSD) it will likely
be a very limited version with no graphics support. And if any of he
disks are DSSI, your out of luck.
> I think AT&T probably will not. It should be
> trivial to find out from the appropriate web sites.
AT&T got out of the biz long before the 4000 came around.
> I would not
> be suprised at a port of Linux in any state.
There has never been a functional version of Linux for any VAX. If it
came about, it wold likely suffer the same shortcomings as the BSD's.
>
>>
>> Is there a version of FreeBSD for the Vax?
>>
>
> I'm fairly sure there is, but I'm not sure if supports the model you
> have.
Not a chance.....
2 Supported Processors and System Boards
2.1 amd64
2.2 i386
2.3 ia64
2.4 pc98
2.5 powerpc
2.6 sparc64
>
>> If there is a functional VMS install on the machine's 4 hard drives (2 each=
>> in the machine and the auxilliary SCSI storage module), is there a way to =
>> dual boot between Unix and VMS?
>
> You can have either UNIX or VMS on each disk, and file systems
> that either UNIX or VMS will understand, but you can't have UNIX and
> VMS on the same disk unless you have a controller that partitions
> the disk and presents itself as multiple drives (DEC's controllers
> didn't do that, but third party controllers did).
>
> It's trivial to select which disk to boot from.
>
> You can get software for UNIX that will provide limited support for
> mounting and reading VMS disks. You most likely will not find
> software for VMS to access UNIX disks.
>
>>
>> I presume that I can get some verison of Emacs running on this system, it d=
>> oes not have to be recent. While Vi may be more historically correct on thi=
>> s machine I much prefer emacs.
>
> emacs should run on any of the UNIX, and older emacs runs on VMS. vi
> should ship with the UNIX, and vi emulators are widely available for
> VMS.
>
>> Any suggestions or ideas?
>>
>> My cell phone probably has significantly more computing power and far more =
>> memory and storage than this "minicomputer", I am approaching this as a hob=
>> byist. I hope to use the system to explore BSD Unix (and possibly AT&T Unix=
>> ) further and do some C programming on it. I anticipate to be working purel=
>> y from the command line. I may explore VMS also at some point.
>>
>> Thanks.
The 4000's do make great (well, as great as any VAX can be today) VMS
machines.
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
billg999 at cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list