[Info-vax] How about RdB for x86 VMS?

[Simon Clubley]

On 2014-09-04, David Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
> Simon Clubley wrote:
>
>> That's criticial because once they actually start a port (instead of
>> just planning one), you have lost them as a future VMS customer.
>
> Why do you state that?
>
> There have been, I believe, at least three (3) statements on c.o.v that 
> ports have been put on hold.
>

AIUI, those were in the _planning_ stage, not the actual doing the port
stage which means it was still viable to put them on hold while further
information emerges.

>
> Don't get into JF mode.

$ set response/mode=good_natured

Ouch. You _really_ know how to hurt a guy. :-)

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world