[Info-vax] How about RdB for x86 VMS?

[Bill Gunshannon]

In article <2e6ffbf4-f39c-4842-a6c1-60354a6be52b at googlegroups.com>,
	"clair.grant at vmssoftware.com" <clairgrant71 at gmail.com> writes:
> Just for the record, I have never considered reading cov to be a waste of time. We appreciate your comments and perspective. For the most part they reflect what we hear in many forums as well as directly from customers. We completely understand the sense of urgency for concrete information but I'll quote a sign I have always had on my office wall...no one cares how fast you can get it wrong. As Hoff says, we are still ordering furniture (literally). But, we are also doing many of the things you are expecting, like putting together serious development schedules. You'll get details about Poulson and x86 when we believe in them. You'll be hearing things soon.
> Clair Grant (Mr., for those who don't me)
> Director of R&D
> VMS Software Inc.

Well, as l ong as you're here and I have your attention....   :-)

Has any thought been given to a serious Educational Program?  Is there
going to be someone specific that would likely be working on this as
things progress?  As stated before, I tried, unsuccessfully, to work
on this with HP.  I am definitely willing to work with someone to try
and do it again.  I think it will be even more challenging now because
there is yet another level of buerocracy that wasn't there last tiem
and I certainly don't know anything of VSI's actual aggreement with HP.
And, the other potential fly in the ointment is that I suspect there
will be a strong push to send me packing at the end of our next fiscal
year which would be the end of May and Graduation.  But, I'm here if I
can help.

bill

-- 
Bill Gunshannon          |  de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n.  Three wolves
billg999 at cs.scranton.edu |  and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton   |
Scranton, Pennsylvania   |         #include <std.disclaimer.h>