[Info-vax] VMS Desktop system

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Dirk Munk wrote 2014-09-15 01:54:
> Shark8 wrote:
>> In another thread, there was some discussion of how a "modern browser"
>> for VMS is needed which, in turn, prompted discussion of VMS as a
>> desktop system.
>>
>> There are apparently a few windowing-managers for VMS (I've seen X and
>> DECWindows mentioned); but as an absolute newcomer to VMS I have no
>> experience with either and, from the context, it seems that neither of
>> these are adequate.
>>
>
> What you bring up here are two different things. DECWindows, X-Windows,
> Motif etc. are client-server applications, where the server has the screen,
> and the client is running the applications. Just the other way around as
> you might expect.
>
> A browser is an application that is usually running on a system that has a
> graphical screen. a PC for instance.
>
> VMS did have a browser, Mozilla, and I used it on my VMS workstation. These
> days it is called Seamonkey, and I'm using it on my PC. Originally it was
> called Netscape as you may know.
>
> Now the question is if VMS should have workstation functionality once more,
> which means it's own graphic drivers and applications like a browser. I
> would say NO.
>
> At present there are three manufacturers for graphic cards left, Intel, AMD
> and Nvidia. Intel has the graphics on the CPU, certain AMD CPUs have an
> embedded GPU. It would not be feasible for VSI to produce drivers for all
> GPUs of these three manufacturers. Building a Mozilla version for VMS is
> also quite a job, and then you still don't have all kind of add on
> applications.
>
> It would be much simpler to put a VM system on an x86 desktop, and run an
> instance of VMS on it, combined with an instance of Windows, Linux, or even
> MAC OS. Let those other operating systems do browsing, mailing etc. By sing
> Samba etc. you can exchange data between bot operating systems. For
> instance, download a file with a browser in windows, and save the file on a
> Samba share of VMS.
>
> Every graphics card can also be used with simple a VESA Bios programming
> interface. That is more than enough for a simple graphical VMS boot screen
> etc. , so no need for advanced graphical drivers.
>
> In my view this should be a future VMS workstation, or desktop, or even
> laptop.

Agree.
Adding all kind of "desktop" stuff nativily to VMS is not where
I'd like my support money to go. That is a dead-end.

But one thing, why do you want/need a VMS instance in a VM on your local
(say) laptop system? What services does VMS provide that is beneficial
to the personal desktop environment and that are unique for VMS?

OK, I can see why a (non-paying) hobbyist would like to have that,
but in a professional environment? For development maybe? But then
you can not run free hobbyist and that would need a major remake
of the licenses. And isn't it just as easy to connect remotely
to your office VMS development system, when needed?

Now, a combined Windows laptop with VMS in a VM might open some
new posibilites for new GUI/IDE solutions for VMS development.
But lets see how much VSI's efforts are directed to the current
VMS sites and how much they will actualy trying to open up
new VMS markets. That is a bit unclear at the moment.