[Info-vax] OpenVMS graphics - once more
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Mon Aug 24 15:28:21 EDT 2015
On 2015-08-24 17:39:30 +0000, David Froble said:
> ...it's my impression there are not decent graphics on VMS. HW and
> Software. Now, it's also my impression that a browser is going to
> expect graphics.
A web browser does require graphics, outside of cases such as Lynx.
Any of the integrated Intel HD graphics that are present on many of the
recent Intel x86-64 chips — yes, you're fond of AMD here, I know — will
be more than sufficient for a web browser, and with no add-on graphics
hardware required. Most of the HD and the higher-spec Iris and Iris
Pro integrated graphics interfaces are also openly documented by Intel,
too. <https://01.org/linuxgraphics/documentation>
> So, the first step isn't any part of a browser, it's the infrastructure
> that a browser will expect.
True; that's also about APIs, certificate stores (if the browser
doesn't have its own), and porting.
> I'd much rather have a good TCP/IP, and SSL, and IPSEC, and ....
Ayup. Which also ties into certificates and certificate-related
processing, too.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list