[Info-vax] Volatile, was: Re: yet another sys$qiow question
VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG
VAXman- at SendSpamHere.ORG
Tue Aug 25 07:34:49 EDT 2015
In article <00AFC216.1A864495 at SendSpamHere.ORG>, VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG writes:
>In article <zgFbrkJP21g+ at eisner.encompasserve.org>, cornelius at eisner.decus.org (George Cornelius) writes:
>>In article <mr792b$f9l$1 at Iltempo.Update.UU.SE>, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> writes:
>>[VAXMAN wrote:]
>>
>>>> TSTL IOSB
>>>> BNEQ 10$
>>>> 20$: BRB 20$
>>>> 10$:
>>
>>Actually, to test just the status in VMS you would use TSTW. But
>>when testing for nonzero TSTL works as well and does not require
>>any extra word extraction code on the newer architectures.
>
>THat's true but Johnny said he defined the IOSB as am int. The C compiler
>doesn't know that that that contains a word maintaining the status.
Grrr... see what tablet typing can do to your ability to write.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list