[Info-vax] OT: news from the trenches (re: Solaris)
glen herrmannsfeldt
gah at ugcs.caltech.edu
Fri Mar 13 15:01:24 EDT 2015
seasoned_geek <roland at logikalsolutions.com> wrote:
(snip, I wrote)
>> The AT/370 maps into host memory at 512K to 640K. The XT/370 takes
>> even more host memory space. Yes terminal, printer, and disks, but
>> much of the processing that is done is S/370 code in real VM/370
>> is done in 8088 code for VM/PC. Some years ago, there was a company
>> selling board sets for a low price, about $30 each.
> http://www.techadvice.com/tech/M/mem-adr.htm
> Do you mean A000-FFFF? Also known as the dastardly 128.
> In theory all for the video card, but low end video cards
> used only a tiny portion so _everybody_ provided cards with
> jumpers and/or dip switches to change the settings so people
> could wedge the card in.
No, X'80000' to X'9FFFF'
The XT/370 uses X'40000' to X'9FFFF'.
It is dual port and bank-switched on the ISA side.
Both boards have 512K on board.
They do virtual addressing with a look-up table that gives the real
address for every page of 4M virtual address, so nothing like the
real S/370 virtual addressing, but much easier to implement.
I (still) have an Everex AT clone from about 1987 that has switches
to allow for 512K on board and the rest in ISA slots.
I also have the memory board for extended (above 1M) memory.
I once wondered about 386SX boards, which would be faster, but not
many of them had/have the ability to do addressing that way.
(snip)
-- glen
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list