[Info-vax] Accuweather new contract

Craig A. Berry craigberry at nospam.mac.com
Sun Mar 29 21:13:03 EDT 2015


On 3/29/15 6:03 PM, Kerry Main wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Info-vax [mailto:info-vax-bounces at info-vax.com] On Behalf Of
>> johnson.eric at gmail.com
>> Sent: 29-Mar-15 4:49 PM
>> To: info-vax at info-vax.com
>> Subject: Re: [New Info-vax] Accuweather new contract

>> My basic mode of comparison was... how long does it take to send a
>> single
>> 80 byte UDP packet. I measured that by doing that in a tight loop. It was
>> pretty
>> easy to write a portable version that ran on both Linux and VMS. For
>> grins
>> I also write a version that used the QIO$ interface. That improved things
>> a little
>> bit, but Linux still won by a wide margin.
>>
>> EJ
>
> Not saying that Linux might be marginally faster, but usually when there Is
> a "wide margin", there is usually something else under pinning the results.
>
> When network results like this are seen, I usually think of the mis-matched
> full duplex auto-config issue with older network gear, NIC's and drivers.

Kerry, please read more details of Eric's careful analysis in the
archives of this group before posting such nonsense.



More information about the Info-vax mailing list