[Info-vax] OpenVMS in the future, Open sourced or Closed? Intent is to keep it...

[Bill Gunshannon]

In article <midsmu$fh7$2 at dont-email.me>,
	David Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> writes:
> John Reagan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:09:28 AM UTC-4, Stephen Hoffman wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-06 12:24:02 +0000, Bill Gunshannon said:
>>>
>>>>> There is also the issue of all the conditional compilation in the 
>>>>> source code which exists for military and/or very high security 
>>>>> clearance eyes only.
>>> That's a new one.  Never heard of that version of OpenVMS before.
>>>
>> 
>> You should see the "Illuminati Edition".  It uses BASIC for the command line interpreter.
> 
> Gee, we back to RSTS/E and Basic Plus ???
> 
> Ready
> 
>:-)


While I saw nothing wrong with RSTS/E and the BASIC+ CLI I usually used
DCL as mine.

I'm still waiting for someone to let me have the source (and permission)
to do my port of RSTS/E to the x86-64.  Why should VMS be the only one
to get the glory.  :-)


bill

-- 
Bill Gunshannon          |  de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n.  Three wolves
billg999 at cs.scranton.edu |  and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton   |
Scranton, Pennsylvania   |         #include <std.disclaimer.h>