[Info-vax] VMS FAQ (was Re: Where to locate software)
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Fri Jun 10 10:58:12 EDT 2016
On 2016-06-10 02:01:47 +0000, David Froble said:
> The Wizard (Stephen Hoffman) maintained the FAQ while he was at DEC et
> al, and I do believe he has a copy on his web page Hoffman Labs. So,
> it's still available, but perhaps a bit dated, just like VMS.
The 2006-vintage OpenVMS FAQ:
http://labs.hoffmanlabs.com/vmsfaq also known as
http://labs.hoffmanlabs.com/node/1
I looked at updating the FAQ and even started porting the FAQ text to
more modern tools — the FAQ is written in DEC/TTI Document SDML, and
I'm not inclined to buy a license for that — and slowly realized that
both the old text format and the segmented newsgroup distribution was a
whole lot of work and for rather less results than are available with
other approaches and tools.
> While helpful, some feel this should be provided by the OS vendor. Not
> sure it matters, as long as it's available.
The recommendations around how software kits and open source packages
are organized and configured best come from the vendor, as they're the
ones that inherently establish the related standards. For any OS
vendor, this (in decreasing order of preference) is either with
explicit recommendations and associated tools and frameworks (e.g. app
bundles, sandboxes, containers, etc), through folks mimicking
conventions based on what the vendor themselves present and document,
or by whatever code perambulations the particular vendor happens to
throw over the wall for end-user folks and third-party folks to deal
with that particular week. As for user opinions, there are already
various recommendations posted both in this thread and around the 'net.
Many are good, some IMO not so good, and none that I've encountered
are even remotely forward-looking.
Were I to tell you how to configure your package, I'm just another bozo
on this bus. I can assure y'all that some of my opinions here would
be unpopular with the crowd that is used to OpenVMS as it is.
I've been considering offering a "Alternate Future OpenVMS"
presentation for the boot camp, covering my opinions around this topic
and other drag-VMS-forward topics. Whether that'd even be of interest
to the session reviewers or attendees? No sé. Certainly not
something I'd expect VSI to implement, either. It's far outside any
presentation I've encountered at a previously boot camp or symposium,
so there's that. But I digress.
> Don't know if Steve is taking and including new submissions for the FAQ.
Have you looked at the HL web site? ~1800 articles. With a way to
start discussions. That's where I've been putting articles. Articles
which can be longer than the quick-hit FAQ-style Q&A format and
discussions.
If I were over at VSI, I'd have a web content management system
deployed for the content (and a whole lot less of the stock photos),
and — for discussions — I'd be pushing for either a Stack site, or
would be using the existing Stack Overflow and related sites and tags.
Discussions locally require forum administration and some very gentle
moderation, or the forums tend to become filled with spam or vitriole.
No, I wouldn't use Notes and the Notes-News or other gateways. At
least not until Notes gets dragged forward. But I digress.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list