[Info-vax] PC/VT Keyboarrd Mapping
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Sat Jun 25 10:14:43 EDT 2016
On 2016-06-25 13:06:18 +0000, Jan-Erik Soderholm said:
> Den 2016-06-25 kl. 14:20, skrev Stephen Hoffman:
>> On 2016-06-25 01:26:25 +0000, David Froble said:
>>
>>> Why is it that whatever you use is great ... and whatever I use should die?
>>
>> There are fewer keyboards with keypads, too.
>
> It's not what I'm seeing. Many new "professional" laptops has larger
> screens today, and it seems as the manfacturers just as well put in a
> real keyboard with numeric kaypad also.
Big and heavy laptops, sure. Some folks have called those
battleship-class. For the folks that are unable or unwilling to carry
around the extra weight that's typically associated with those laptops,
a different approach for applications is warranted.
> And besides, even if you have an laptop, most professionals will hook
> up an external keyboard and screen anyway.
Yes, many will. For those using OpenVMS, ponder why that might be the
case. The laptop keyboard might be cramped or might just be a bad
keyboard — both of those cases certainly exist — or the folks might be
using keys and keypads and features that don't exist on the laptop
keyboard. It's the latter case that I'm referencing. Which means
you're adding hardware. In the case of the LK, hardware which is no
longer manufactured is a prerequisite for effective use of the
software. I've seen more than a few folks using external mice, too.
Watching a typical Windows user arrive at a table, set up the power
supply and — for those that want or need it — the external keyboard and
the mouse — is always interesting to watch. Particularly when
comparing with folks that don't. Roller bags or porters can help
with all that, too. But I digress.
Keeping application software working is laudable. But dependencies
on declining hardware and particularly dependences on hardware that is
no longer available — such as the DEC LK — not so much. Best to remove
those dependencies.
>
>> Unfortunately what you're using — the keypad-based application...
>
> You've got to keep applications apart from the editing.
> I use EDT to edit our web based "GUI" applications.
Applications using the keypad are dying out. EDT is an application.
Applications that use the LK are dead. That hardware is no longer available.
Applications that use a PC keyboard and a full-size PC keypad are
certainly preferable to those still using a DEC LK layout, but those
applications are still reducing what hardware is compatible with the
applications.
>> and keypad-based editors — is dying out...
>
> EDT isn't "dying". Or, it is dying at the same pace as VMS is.
EDT was deprecated some twenty years ago. EVE/TPU and LSEDIT were the
migration path.
Keypad-based editors and other keypad-based applications are dying out.
That's because you can depend on the keyboard being present, but can't
depend on the keypad — PC extended, or particularly the DEC LK — being
available.
>> OpenVMS apps either need to forget about the VMS-layout LK and/or provide
>> an alternative to the keypad...
>
> The keypad works just OK on any standard PC keyboard. With a few small
> differences that should be easy to learn for any IT professional.
Other than that applications that have dependencies on the keypad, and
that the traditional extended keypad is becoming less common, and that
the DEC LK keyboard is no longer manufactured, sure.
Get off the LK.
Reduce your dependencies on the full-sized keyboards, and work to
eliminate dependencies on DEC LK keyboard layouts.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list