[Info-vax] RMS record metadata, was: Re: Re; Spiralog, RMS Journaling (was

[David Froble]

Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> Den 2016-06-25 kl. 18:52, skrev David Froble:
>> Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>>> Den 2016-06-24 kl. 12:54, skrev lawrencedo99 at gmail.com:
>>>> On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 1:01:41 AM UTC+12, Bob Koehler wrote:
>>>>> In article <63640867-9291-407e-a328-04bc6ccb8cac at googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Lawrence D’Oliveiro writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everything else at the application layer now uses SQL*.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe in your life.  But you are not the whole world.
>>>>
>>>> Certainly the whole *modern* world...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, SQL is what runs common business applications today.
>>> But there have never been any questions about that (well,
>>> yes I know that David has some old non-SQL applications
>>> but they are hardly typical).
>>
>> To be accurate, David has some NEW non-SQL applications.  Development 
>> is an
>> ongoing thing.
> 
> Yes, if we narrow down our view to whatever David is doing.
> Should we do that?

 From David's perspective, that's all that matters ....

Don't you think that it's not so good to think your way is the only way?  Oppps, 
didn't I just do that?

:-)

Actually, no, I didn't.  I'm just saying there can be more than one way ...

> And more specificaly, should *VSI* do that?
> I don't thing so. Better to look a bit further down the road.

I got no problem with looking ahead, but let's just not be into burning bridges 
behind ourselves ....