[Info-vax] Use of media with licenses
Stephen Hoffman
seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid
Wed Nov 9 10:33:19 EST 2016
On 2016-11-08 18:23:48 +0000, David Turner said:
> That was my take on the matter
> So it literally comes down to the date you purchase the license
> I am placing an order for the "old" version of VMS 8.4.
> So in theory, since the patches have not been updated since APril 2016,
> the license is good for all versions of 8.4 up to the date of the
> purchase
>
> HPE is totally unhelpful with this. I cannot even get hold of anyone
> anywhere at HP (even Renew and Refurb) and they are unable to explain
> or help with their policies
>
> Methinks this is going to help VSI even more. It is a good thing for
> the VMS world to have a company with a "vested interest" in this
> product.
>From old, increasingly dim and distant recollection and very far from
official... OpenVMS licenses traditionally permitted use of any for
OpenVMS releases and patches up to the date of purchase plus the
initial warranty period, and any earlier releases. Using releases
older than the processor supported or releases that required other and
earlier licenses — the old DECnet patches, for instance — wasn't ever
dealt with very well. This policy wasn't ever enforced in LMF, due to
the lack of a software warranty update to the existing license PAK.
This policy may well have changed, or I may well have remembered it
wrong. There have been some comments posted here and elsewhere around
having to pay for the intervening support if you're relicensing a
system, too. Though I've not seen official notice of that — the
practice in at least one old era used to involve a requirement to rebuy
the software license to restart support, but that may well have changed.
The software license management (SLM) site disappeared five or six
years ago — that was were the policies and such were documented — and
maybe the folks at http://licensing.hp.com/slm/contact might still have
that info. http://g5w0675.atlanta.hp.com/slm/swl/view.slm?page=index
was the old SLM site — in addition the policies, that was were the
License Unit Requirements LURT tables and other details were published,
too — and that site was excluded from the Internet Archive,
unfortunately.
HPE has a few more years of selling Tukwila servers with V8.4 licenses,
then it's all VSI. Hopefully VSI gets this and other related issues
sorted. This and related practices are all badly stuck in the 1990s,
unfortunately.
--
Pure Personal Opinion | HoffmanLabs LLC
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list