[Info-vax] Restrict the use of SUBMIT/USER= to one particular user.

[Kerry Main]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Info-vax [mailto:info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com] On Behalf
> Of David Froble via Info-vax
> Sent: 10-Nov-16 2:24 PM
> To: info-vax at rbnsn.com
> Cc: David Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com>
> Subject: Re: [Info-vax] Restrict the use of SUBMIT/USER= to one
> particular user.
> 
> Kerry Main wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Info-vax [mailto:info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com] On
> Behalf Of Jay
> >> E. Morris via Info-vax
> >> Sent: 10-Nov-16 11:53 AM
> >> To: info-vax at rbnsn.com
> >> Cc: Jay E. Morris <morrisj at epsilon3.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [Info-vax] Restrict the use of SUBMIT/USER= to
> one
> >> particular user.
> >>
> >> On 11/10/2016 09:14 AM, Kerry Main wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Info-vax [mailto:info-vax-bounces at rbnsn.com] On
> >> Behalf Of Bob
> >>>> Koehler via Info-vax
> >>>> Sent: 10-Nov-16 8:34 AM
> >>>> To: info-vax at rbnsn.com
> >>>> Cc: Bob Koehler <koehler at eisner.nospam.decuserve.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Info-vax] Restrict the use of SUBMIT/USER=
to
> >> one
> >>>> particular user.
> >>>>
> >>>> In article <mailman.0.1478736379.32526.info-
> >>>> vax_rbnsn.com at rbnsn.com>, "Kerry Main"
> >>>> <kemain.nospam at gmail.com> writes:
> >>>>> What about Trump's taxes that show his business links to
> >>> China
> >>>> and
> >>>>> Russia?
> >>>>    There's a reason Moscow is celibrating.
> >>>>
> >>>> [...]
> >>>>> Sounds like many in the US want a wall around their
entire
> >>>> country,
> >>>>> not just in the south.
> >>>>    I understand the Canadian imigration web site crashed
so
> >>> many
> >>>> times
> >>>>    Wednesday that they just shut it down.
> >>>>
> >>>>    Maybe it's time to get active in the curling club
again.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Shhhhh.. we in Canada actually have a plan to make the US
> our
> >> 11th
> >>> province.
> >>>
> >>> About the only thing we have not figured out is how to tell
> > the
> >> folks
> >>> in Texas that they will lose their guns and they need to
> > learn to
> >>> speak French.
> >>>
> >>> :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Don't think the Independent Republic of Texas is going to
> worry about
> >> that to much.
> >>
> >
> > Or the Republic of California: (now calling for a "Calexit"
even
> > though very unlikely)
> > http://www.businessinsider.com/california-secession-calexit-
> 2016-
> > 11
> 
> Well, the only real problem is, some of these people don't know
> how to live in a democracy.  Possibly don't even understand the
> definition of democracy.
> 
> The people of the USA have spoken.  Not the royalty (in their
> minds) of the Democratic party leadership, nor those who think
> they always know best.  For those feeling a bit (or more)
upset,
> what if they had won, and the other side was having temper
> tantrums?  Would they call them cry babies?  If so, perhaps
they
> need more mirrors.
> 

Well, from an outsider looking in perspective, the counter
argument to this might be that HC was up by 10-12 points in the
various polls approx. 3 weeks before the election. Then the FBI
initiates the whole email thing with no valid reason (according
to both Rep and Democrat legal gurus) and all of a sudden the
lead crashes. Of course, no mention of the still going on
investigation into the other campaign party's links to Russia and
WikiLeaks.

In addition, you can add the illegally hacked emails being
released by design in a drip, drip fashion. 

Of course, no emails from the Rep party. I am sure the media
would love to have seen some of the internal Republican party
emails regarding Trump and how to deal with him. Or internal
emails from Trump lawyers about his still-not-released taxes.

These types of activities are not part of democracy - at least
not here anyway.