[Info-vax] What would you miss if DECnet got the chop? Was: "bad select 38" (OpenSSL on VMS)

[David Froble]

Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) wrote:
> In article <nt5stt$9c7$1 at dont-email.me>, Stephen Hoffman
> <seaohveh at hoffmanlabs.invalid> writes: 
> 
>> DIRECTORY /FTP works fine without DECnet, and supports domain names.   
>> Available since V6.2.
> 
> What about running a local procedure with input to or output to a remote 
> disk?
> 

As Steve wrote, a FAL based on TCP/IP would be a welcome thing.  Until then, use 
DECnet where you can.

And in the background we hear Dirk chanting ...

Phase IV must die!
Phase IV must die!
Phase IV must die!
.
.
.
.