[Info-vax] %MAIL-E-UAFOPNERR, error opening user authorization file
Phillip Helbig undress to reply
helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de
Wed Sep 7 02:05:02 EDT 2016
In article <nqn4d4$vrs$2 at dont-email.me>, Simon Clubley
<clubley at remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> writes:
> On 2016-09-04, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) <helbig at asclothestro.multivax.de> wrote:
> > I saw this recently in the log of a batch job. It occurred during a
> > SET FORWARD command. I've never seen it before.
> >
> > I was logged in at the time. Nothing strange was going on.
> >
> > What can cause this?
>
> Any I/O errors on the disk ?
Just the usual few.
> Is the disk either shadowed or part of a RAID set ?
Part of a shadow set.
> And yes, I _know_ that read errors are supposed to be handled
> transparently in the latter case :-), but given the age of some of
> the hardware Phillip is running...
Old but gold. :-)
I do plan to move to x86 and, presumably, more modern disks if and when
a hobbyist license (as promised) for x86 becomes available. Also
promised was a mixed-architecture cluster with 8.4 Alpha, so the
migration can proceed in steps. (I ran a mixed VAX/Alpha cluster for 14
years).
My guess is that there is no SSD and/or flash supported on Alpha (except
perhaps the old SBB 268-MB SSDs---so no MODERN SSD or Flash). Or could
I move to more modern disks sooner? (Cost, of course, is an issue on a
hobbyist system. I now have enough spare SBB disks, in the sizes I
need, to last several years.)
How does the MTBF of modern SSD and flash disks compare to that of
traditional disks? I recall hearing---several years ago---of SSDs which
were shot after half an hour where conventional disks lasted months or
years (admittedly on a very high I/O system). Can one rewrite them
often enough now?
> Any mount verification events ?
No.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list