[Info-vax] PowerX Roadmap - Extended beyond 2020
David Froble
davef at tsoft-inc.com
Fri Sep 16 22:57:30 EDT 2016
Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2016-09-16, David Froble <davef at tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
>> IanD wrote:
>>> When one looks at things like the Gartner report on IoT for 2017 - 2018, the
>>> power requirements of devices is going to need to be extremely low
>> Again, I ask, what has this to do with VMS. That's a HW issue. You might say
>> that VMS doesn't run on light weight HW, today, but that doesn't mean it
>> couldn't in the future. However, just talking about VMS as an OS, perhaps it
>> just might work well in some new environments.
>>
>
> Once again... :-)
>
> How many VMS systems do you think are capable of running on a single
> PP3 battery or the equivalent current of a PP3 ?
>
> Once you solve that problem with either an ARM or MIPS port how much
> effort do you think it would then take to restructure VMS along the
> lines of an embedded OS so that you can write a BSP to allow VMS to
> be brought up on your custom ARM or MIPS board ?
>
> This would also include the tools to generate a custom VMS bootable
> image (which would include your application) which could be booted
> directly (for example) from flash. (Note that this isn't a USB flash
> drive but flash sitting directly on the memory bus.)
>
> What do you think are the chances of VSI doing this work when there
> are a large range of established embedded OS options, both real time
> and otherwise, already in existence ?
>
> IOW, it simply isn't going to happen.
>
> Simon.
>
I never said it would happen. In fact, I do believe that I wrote that VSI would
never spend money on something from which they could never see any revenue.
But, it's not going to happen because of business reasons, not technical reasons.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list