[Info-vax] What would you miss if DECnet got the chop? Was: "bad select 38"
Bob Koehler
koehler at eisner.nospam.decuserve.org
Mon Sep 19 09:36:38 EDT 2016
In article <SgzDz.577571$uE7.160734 at fx14.ams1>, Dirk Munk <munk at home.nl> writes:
>
> Yes DECnet is very obsolete for VMS. I'm sorry, I've forgotten this.
> What is the plain IP replacement for something simple as FAL please?
DEC submitted a RFC for a FAL-like capability. It didn't get adopted.
ISO/OSI also submitted an RFC for thier equivalent to FAL as
an IP protocol. It dwasn't adopted, either.
In a world where a whole bunch of folks run around on thier
byte-stream-only file systems caliming "binary always works", the
recognition of more powerfull file systems with other file organizations
can't get above the hype.
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list