[Info-vax] DCL Integer Overflow
Scott Dorsey
kludge at panix.com
Thu Jul 6 22:13:50 EDT 2017
In article <ojmndm$d6e$1 at gioia.aioe.org>,
=?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= <arne at vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>On 7/6/2017 9:08 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>> In article <ojmeth$39c$1 at gioia.aioe.org>,
>> =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= <arne at vajhoej.dk> wrote:
>>> On 7/6/2017 1:06 PM, Bob Koehler wrote:
>>>> In article <ojk0d7$7nb$1 at gioia.aioe.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=c3=b8j?= <arne at vajhoej.dk> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would have said 60's and 70's.
>>>>
>>>> I never saw anything as good as DCL in the 60s. DCL started to show
>>>> up in the late 70s, but it changed a lot by the early 80s. As poor
>>>> as it is for programming, it used to be worse.
>>>
>>> I know when DCL came around.
>>>
>>> But when looking at some of the language characteristics (two
>>> data types, if but not switch/case, no loops only goto, fixed format),
>>> then I think more 1960-1980 than 1980-2000.
>>
>> If you're thinking 60s and 70s, you should look at JCL, and the
>> horrible horrible CCL that CDC NOS used... and even worse that
>> Burroughs Job Language....
>
>I have worked on CDC NOS.
I am terribly, terribly sorry.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
More information about the Info-vax
mailing list